|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
robkb
Joined: 29 May 2009 Posts: 4205 Location: SE London
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
Mithril
Joined: 22 Jul 2011 Posts: 1755 Location: wessex
|
|
|
|
|
robkb
Joined: 29 May 2009 Posts: 4205 Location: SE London
|
|
|
|
|
bulworthy project
Joined: 27 Jun 2011 Posts: 188 Location: Rackenford, Devon
|
|
|
|
|
sean Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 42207 Location: North Devon
|
|
|
|
|
Ty Gwyn
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Posts: 4563 Location: Lampeter
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 12 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
Maybe BP can clarify the value of the charcoal in that kiln,
It was mentioned there was 150kg of saleable charcoal,worth £250,
He eventually recieved £4 per bag,
Are the bags only weighing 2.4kg?
Other than BP`s practical content to this series,i have found it a rather haphazard and starry eyed approach,esspecially his comment about the mountain bikers,``And you have`nt got to cut the tree`s down``,
I thought the whole programme was about woodland management,
At least he has`nt got to rely on it for a living. |
|
|
|
|
Mithril
Joined: 22 Jul 2011 Posts: 1755 Location: wessex
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 12 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
Ty Gwyn wrote: |
Maybe BP can clarify the value of the charcoal in that kiln,
It was mentioned there was 150kg of saleable charcoal,worth £250,
He eventually recieved £4 per bag,
Are the bags only weighing 2.4kg?
Other than BP`s practical content to this series,i have found it a rather haphazard and starry eyed approach,esspecially his comment about the mountain bikers,``And you have`nt got to cut the tree`s down``,
I thought the whole programme was about woodland management,
At least he has`nt got to rely on it for a living. |
I thought he meant that it wasn't necessary for the mountain bikers, not that they wouldn't ever be felled. So, the recreational users were a side line that didn't interfer with long or short term plans for the trees. |
|
|
|
|
bulworthy project
Joined: 27 Jun 2011 Posts: 188 Location: Rackenford, Devon
|
|
|
|
|
Pilsbury
Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 5645 Location: East london/Essex
|
|
|
|
|
Ty Gwyn
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Posts: 4563 Location: Lampeter
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 12 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
Thanks BP,
like you mention Foreign charcoal being more dense than the UK product,
1.does that imply a lot of the foreign is made from hardwood waste
2.that the UK product burns a lot quicker than the Foreign
3.also,that if users are not educated to this fact, that food can be started to be cooked earlier with UK charcoal than the foreign product,users will be wasting the product,and thinking it does`nt last as long,like the example of the 2 chefs you highlighted.
Its also a shame the chemical content of foreign charcoal was not mentioned,as i dare say,a lot of the users know nothing of this. |
|
|
|
|
bulworthy project
Joined: 27 Jun 2011 Posts: 188 Location: Rackenford, Devon
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 12 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
Ty Gwyn wrote: |
Thanks BP,
like you mention Foreign charcoal being more dense than the UK product,
1.does that imply a lot of the foreign is made from hardwood waste
2.that the UK product burns a lot quicker than the Foreign
3.also,that if users are not educated to this fact, that food can be started to be cooked earlier with UK charcoal than the foreign product,users will be wasting the product,and thinking it does`nt last as long,like the example of the 2 chefs you highlighted.
Its also a shame the chemical content of foreign charcoal was not mentioned,as i dare say,a lot of the users know nothing of this. |
1. The production of rainforest charcoal involves piling up vast amounts of hardwood (mahogony, teak etc...) often whole trees as even though the wood is more valuable as timber it is lighter to transport as charcoal. Earth is then piled on top and the wood set alight. This is a massivly inefficient method of producing charcoal, but the economics (no cost of illegal deforestation and a labour force on less than a dollar a day) add up. We had a woman from Kenya at our place learning about charcoal production using a ring kiln and she was supprised that the site was not covered with vast piles of ash as she has seen back home.
2. British charcoal does burn out quicker but this is more than made up for by the fact that it heats quicker. Not only can you start cooking earlier but if you need to add more you can add it a little at a time meaning that you only add what you need.
3. People who do not realise that British charcoal heats quickly will use more than necesarry. We say about the heating time on the back of our charcoal bags for this reason.
We did not realise the differences in quality and environmental impact between British and imported charcoal until we started making it. We now try to do all we can to educate people about this. |
|
|
|
|
Ty Gwyn
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Posts: 4563 Location: Lampeter
|
|
|
|
|
robkb
Joined: 29 May 2009 Posts: 4205 Location: SE London
|
|
|
|
|
Andy B
Joined: 12 Jan 2005 Posts: 3920 Location: Brum
|
|
|
|
|
|