|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
paul1963
Joined: 15 Nov 2010 Posts: 2161 Location: No longer active on the forum
|
|
|
|
|
gythagirl
Joined: 18 Feb 2010 Posts: 1467 Location: Somerset
|
|
|
|
|
sean Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 42207 Location: North Devon
|
|
|
|
|
sgt.colon
Joined: 27 Jul 2009 Posts: 7380 Location: Just south of north.
|
|
|
|
|
Azura Skye
Joined: 14 Jun 2005 Posts: 2199 Location: Carmarthenshire
|
|
|
|
|
JohnB
Joined: 09 Jul 2005 Posts: 685 Location: Beautiful sunny West Wales!
|
|
|
|
|
Behemoth
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 19023 Location: Leeds
|
|
|
|
|
Mithril
Joined: 22 Jul 2011 Posts: 1755 Location: wessex
|
|
|
|
|
Behemoth
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 19023 Location: Leeds
|
|
|
|
|
Azura Skye
Joined: 14 Jun 2005 Posts: 2199 Location: Carmarthenshire
|
|
|
|
|
Behemoth
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 19023 Location: Leeds
|
|
|
|
|
12Bore
Joined: 15 Jun 2008 Posts: 9089 Location: Paddling in the Mersey
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 12 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
We went last night, with some trepidation based on my history with LOTR, and thoroughly enjoyed it! Yes, you could trim out 30 mins without ant loss, but it flowed better than I anticipated.
We watched it in 3D, having (reluctantly) sold 3D tV and Blu-ray since their launch I wanted to see something in 3D before seeing it in 2D, I've never been impressed with 3D on a small screen and now I can honestly say I'm slightly less unimpressed with big screen 3D. It may well be me that is over critical, but 3D still cannot do fast motion smoothly and (ironically) gives a "processed" effect to CGI in particular, but that's not the fault of the film or the director, the technology just isn't right yet.
Back to the film, go see it, it is very good, just like the book, it seems "lighter" and more enjoyable than LOTR. |
|
|
|
|
Gai
Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 408 Location: Ireland
|
|
|
|
|
AnnaD
Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 2777 Location: Edinburgh
|
|
|
|
|
jamanda Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 22 Oct 2006 Posts: 35056 Location: Devon
|
|
|
|
|
|