Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
Horse meat correctly labelled buy it option?
Page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Livestock and Pets
Author 
 Message
Nick



Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 34535
Location: Hereford
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

toggle wrote:
it's blindingly obvious if you think about this logically.

horse is not a cheap substitute for beef.

so if someone was making money out of substituting horse for beef, then this wasn't horse that could ahve been sold legally.

if tou think someone should be eating it, eat it yourself


But when there's a flood of discarded horses onto the market it becomes a cheap substitute. And the reason it couldn't be sold as horse legally is likely to be more of a surplus of supply and temporary lack of demand; nothing to do with safety. (Although screening for bute would have been nice).

There was such a flood when Romania banned horses on the highway.

RichardW



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 8443
Location: Llyn Peninsular North Wales
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 8:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Well said Nick.

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 8:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

RichardW wrote:
Well said Nick.


That doesn't make it safe to eat. If you let it into the food chain you make a mockery of the whole system and the people who stick to it.

Nick



Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 34535
Location: Hereford
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 8:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

No, it doesn't. But I did mention bute testing. Clearly, the system is flawed, badly, I was just highlighting that Toggle's assumption that it wasn't legally saleable (given the drug testing) was wrong.

It probably was fully safe, just got a better price if sold as beef.

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 9:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Yeah, I was just meaning that Richard having not seen the evidence is similar to the authorities not seeing it. The poor might wish to eat it, but it should be their free choice, not the whim of a well fed westerner who couldn't be bothered to check.

The main problem is that the richest countries want ever cheaper food, which strides our ability to produce it at home, and stop people from eating their home grown produce.

oldish chris



Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 4148
Location: Comfortably Wet Southport
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 9:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

The meat producers will put me right:

My understanding is that there is a process to ensure than meat is fit to eat. It boils down to ticking boxes. If all the boxes are ticked then we can be confident that the meat is OK. If the box ticking is avoided, then the meat may well be OK, but who knows?

(I do realise that a little old tick may be the result of two years diligence on the part of the farmer)

Nick



Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 34535
Location: Hereford
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Essentially, yes, but you could always lie when you tick a box (or don't tick it).

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

There's a little more to it than that, including on farm inspections, vet checks, cross referencing, prescription only medicines, slaughtered checks & training. Trouble is that it doesn't necessarily apply to imports.

toggle



Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Posts: 11622
Location: truro
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 11:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Nick wrote:
No, it doesn't. But I did mention bute testing. Clearly, the system is flawed, badly, I was just highlighting that Toggle's assumption that it wasn't legally saleable (given the drug testing) was wrong.

It probably was fully safe, just got a better price if sold as beef.


what else are you going to test it for?

do you have any tracability?



i'm back to what i said before. eat it yourself

Nick



Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 34535
Location: Hereford
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 11:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

..

Last edited by Nick on Mon Feb 25, 13 11:31 am; edited 1 time in total

mochyn



Joined: 21 Dec 2004
Posts: 24585
Location: mid-Wales
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 11:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

We tried some of BOTT's horse jerky at the weekend. Brought some home too: it's yummy.

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 11:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Was it as good as IKEA meat balls?

mochyn



Joined: 21 Dec 2004
Posts: 24585
Location: mid-Wales
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Don't know: I've never had Ikea meatballs.

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 11:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

mochyn wrote:
Don't know: I've never had Ikea meatballs.


Not knowingly, anyway...

RichardW



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 8443
Location: Llyn Peninsular North Wales
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 13 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Horses have passports just like cattle. They should have all meds noted again just like cattle. Movements are recorded.

So its down to trust for horses & cattle that the records have been kept honestly.

The best option is still to raise your own, or buy from a personally trusted source.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Livestock and Pets All times are GMT
Page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright © 2004 marsjupiter.com