Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
Metposts or equivalent
Page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Land Management
Author 
 Message
pollyanna



Joined: 03 Nov 2012
Posts: 221

PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 14 12:10 am    Post subject:  Reply with quote    

On Skomer they support the roof with Y-shaped metal set in concrete with a bolt through the wood.

They must have the worst weather you can think of on the island, plus salt-laden winds, so they must be sturdy.

mousjoos



Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 1977
Location: VERY Sunny SW France
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 14 6:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote    

I prefer treated posts concreted in the ground...continue the concrete above ground with in 4 - 5 inches of shuttering & gently slope the top surface away from the post; this way water can't pool around the post & any remaining dries sufficiently quickly
I built a stable block on very uneven ground for a client some years ago & it's as sturdy now as at the beginning
Stand the posts in preservative before building for as long as it takes for it to soak a good distance up the post, the once in the ground a few small rocks or stones in the bottom of the hole stop the post being in direct contact with the earth

If this is teaching you to suck eggs, apologies

Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 9980

PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 14 8:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote    

I wouldn't go for metposts either. They are very difficult to keep upright so your chances of having vertical posts are reduced.

You could either go for treated posts concreted in (go for Class 4 as ordinary treated aren't too good these days), or for real longevity, try chestnut and dig/ram them in if possible, or failing that a combination of digging and ramming. Cheapest way of getting them is from chestnut coppice. Most workers will provide them peeled, pointed and in the round for you. They are heavy though.

onemanband



Joined: 26 Dec 2010
Posts: 1473
Location: NCA90
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 14 12:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

Mistress Rose wrote:
...... as ordinary treated aren't too good these days


Yeh quality of timber in standard posts is awfull. If I ever have to cut with the grain or chisel them, the grain is all over the place. They bow and twist real easy too. I'd only give modern 3x3 posts 5 years.
What are they made from that makes them so poor quality?

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 34205
Location: yes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 14 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

in clay ramming or dig and backfill( 500mm below for every m above and no rocks) is best as the heave from drying/wetting can make a lump of concrete move

the stuff re posts being rubbish from many suppliers is true ,code 4 or chestnut (or elm) if the ground is wet ,some folk char the underground bit of chestnut but i would use extra preservative on all cut ends

another option is railway sleepers as a footing with the shed built on top

Nick



Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 33851
Location: Hereford
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 14 1:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

Bet you're glad you asked now. A two hour weekend project has become a major civil engineering project.

My tuppence? Get a steel fabricator to build you a proper store, and site it on a sheet of granite airlifted in from the Scottish Highlands. Enrobe it in Kevlar and obsidian. It'll last for years.

Last edited by Nick on Wed Feb 05, 14 1:04 pm; edited 1 time in total

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 34205
Location: yes
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 14 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    


onemanband



Joined: 26 Dec 2010
Posts: 1473
Location: NCA90
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 14 8:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

@ Nick ....... and there's still the floor, walls and roof to discuss .....

Hairyloon



Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15039
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
PostPosted: Tue Feb 04, 14 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

Mistress Rose wrote:
You could either go for treated posts concreted in...

Having dug up the concreting from former treated posts I would advise against this.
If you're concreting them in, then go for concrete posts.
I've always been happy with Metposts or equivalent. The only time they've given me real trouble was when I had to put one in too close to a tree, and I could not stop it twisting... still held the fence up well enough.

Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 9980

PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 14 8:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote    

You don't need to treat chestnut on cut ends as the natural tannins in the wood preserve it. You shouldn't concrete chestnut or oak as they are acid, but having said that, son has dug out old oak gate posts that were concreted in that have been perfectly all right.

The preservative used to be copper-chrome-arsenic. The chrome was removed first, then the arsenic, and the copper just isn't up to the job. If you buy 'softwood' you can also be getting anything, and some timbers just are less suitable than others, but cheap.

The main posts are a problem as they have to hold up the whole structure, but a good log store needs open of slatted sides and a sloping roof. Ideally the logs should be held off the ground on pallets of slatted floor to help air circulation.

roobarb



Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 133
Location: Carmarthenshire
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 14 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

Blimey...all we want is to construct a simple log store... it may turn into an major engineering project at this rate

I need to consult with the OH, but metposts seemed the simplest option to us - we didn't want to have to dig lots of holes and mix concrete, but we may look again given your responses.

This is our second attempt at a log store (the first one is now too small for our needs), so we know about allowing air flow through the sides and floor, and used pallets extensively in the previous store. A downsizer world without pallets would be a struggle

mousjoos



Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 1977
Location: VERY Sunny SW France
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 14 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

I think the gist is that Metposts are shit

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 34205
Location: yes
PostPosted: Wed Feb 05, 14 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

the simplest log store is a few sacrificial bearers and a bit of plastic on the top of the logs with a couple of logs to hold it on

Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 9980

PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 14 7:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote    

You are right Dpack. We tell people new to woodburning to stack their firewood somewhere the air can blow through it, preferably on a pallet or something and with a tarp over just the top and the sides open.

gregotyn



Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 1718
Location: Llanfyllin area
PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 14 3:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote    

Roobarb, if I were in your shoes then I would follow Ty Gwyn's advice, concrete 4 steel pieces into the ground and bolt the posts on, rather than drive them in. I was a fencing contractor years ago, and we never used metposts, but they can be driven into the ground using sacrifice timbers to be hit rather than the met post itself, without affecting the galv. However there are some decent galvanizing 'paint on's' now which with 90% zinc are pretty good. It is persuading them to drive straight that is the problem, and in the position you want them. Eventually the iron work rusts and the log store rocks itself free! Others may say differently, but he who descibes the metpost as s..t gets my vote!

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Land Management All times are GMT
Page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright 2004 marsjupiter.com