Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
Gravity Light
Page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Energy Efficiency and Construction/Major Projects
Author 
 Message
RichardW



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 8443
Location: Llyn Peninsular North Wales
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 14 9:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Crap products get awards all the time.

Flamin'Panda



Joined: 09 Feb 2014
Posts: 464
Location: Azores
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 14 8:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

RichardW wrote:
Crap products get awards all the time.


I still don't see why you think this about this product. The brilliance is how they have managed to get the price to what it is.

RichardW



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 8443
Location: Llyn Peninsular North Wales
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 14 9:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Price is not everything.

It needs to be good value.

Not just in cash terms but in the use of resources.

I forecast that most of those that do eventually get made will not be in use 12 months later.

a, because its price was to low so too many corners were cut & they fail

b, it fails to do what is claimed

It can only produce 0.1 watt even if some one was there 24/7 re arming it it will still only produce 2.4Wh in a 24 hour period. A human can produce about 100 watts for short periods via a cycle & would only have to pedal for 90 seconds to make the same amount of energy. I bet thats less time that it takes to re arm the gravity light 48 times.


PS you should look at just what can be made for a pittance now days. Things that get sold in shops for say £50 actually cost less than a few pounds to make. Most of the money charged is profit for each leg of its journey to the shop.

Flamin'Panda



Joined: 09 Feb 2014
Posts: 464
Location: Azores
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 14 10:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

RichardW wrote:
Price is not everything.

It needs to be good value.

Not just in cash terms but in the use of resources.

I forecast that most of those that do eventually get made will not be in use 12 months later.

a, because its price was to low so too many corners were cut & they fail

b, it fails to do what is claimed

It can only produce 0.1 watt even if some one was there 24/7 re arming it it will still only produce 2.4Wh in a 24 hour period. A human can produce about 100 watts for short periods via a cycle & would only have to pedal for 90 seconds to make the same amount of energy. I bet thats less time that it takes to re arm the gravity light 48 times.


PS you should look at just what can be made for a pittance now days. Things that get sold in shops for say £50 actually cost less than a few pounds to make. Most of the money charged is profit for each leg of its journey to the shop.


How will we know what the outcome will be, unless it is used and tested in the context/arena that it is intended for. And I think that we all understand the basics of manufacturing/profit...


onemanband



Joined: 26 Dec 2010
Posts: 1473
Location: NCA90
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 14 4:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

RichardW wrote:
Ok look at it this way.

We have known about this for 2 years. I would guess that they have been working on it now for about double that.


And in 2 years this has reached nearly a million homes.

How many gravity lights are in use ?

Hairyloon



Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 14 4:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Also this.

RichardW



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 8443
Location: Llyn Peninsular North Wales
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 14 9:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Both are brilliant.

Flamin'Panda



Joined: 09 Feb 2014
Posts: 464
Location: Azores
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 14 6:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

onemanband wrote:
RichardW wrote:
Ok look at it this way.

We have known about this for 2 years. I would guess that they have been working on it now for about double that.


And in 2 years this has reached nearly a million homes.

How many gravity lights are in use ?


Unlike some people, who I believe are either jealous or have some kind of commercial interest in slamming the gravity light, I think that what you have posted here is also an excellent idea. Their business model is fantastic - and the product works. Anything that helps rid the world of kerosene lamps is certainly a step in the right direction.

RichardW



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 8443
Location: Llyn Peninsular North Wales
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 14 9:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Flamin'Panda wrote:


Unlike some people, who I believe are either jealous or have some kind of commercial interest in slamming the gravity light,



As that is obviously aimed at me I will reply.

I have no commercial interest is any form of light gravity or other wise powered.

Why would I be jealous of a product that is rubbish?

My main gripe is that they spent two years looking for money to support this when anyone with a calculator can plainly see that unless they up the weight (to more than a person can lift), the height (limited by the room height) & its strength (limited by cost) then it wont provide anything like the amount of light needed let alone be a source of power to recharge items like they claim.

Flamin'Panda



Joined: 09 Feb 2014
Posts: 464
Location: Azores
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 14 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

It was aimed in general, but if the cap fits.....

Bodger



Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 13524

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 14 1:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

You might be Flamin by name but why be Flamin by nature? You're just being rude to people unnecessarily. You've already told another member to shut his trap in another thread of yours. There's absolutely no need for your behavior on what is a genuinely helpful and friendly forum.

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45457
Location: yes
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 14 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

RichardW wrote:
Both are brilliant.


yep and cover all 24hrs

Mr O



Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 5512
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 14 1:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Bodger wrote:
You might be Flamin by name but why be Flamin by nature? You're just being rude to people unnecessarily. You've already told another member to shut his trap in another thread of yours. There's absolutely no need for your behavior on what is a genuinely helpful and friendly forum.

Perhaps he is just a little over enthusiastic?

Flamin'Panda



Joined: 09 Feb 2014
Posts: 464
Location: Azores
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 14 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Bodger wrote:
You might be Flamin by name but why be Flamin by nature? You're just being rude to people unnecessarily. You've already told another member to shut his trap in another thread of yours. There's absolutely no need for your behavior on what is a genuinely helpful and friendly forum.


I am sure that if, and I state quite clearly, if, I have been rude to another member, then they are more than capable of remonstrating with me themselves. As for my behavior, um, kettle, black.... One thing this panda does is always stick up for itself, not look to others to surround it for support, or go running to teacher every time some one so much as looks in its direction.

Bodger



Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 13524

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 14 7:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Oh well spoken.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Energy Efficiency and Construction/Major Projects All times are GMT
Page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright © 2004 marsjupiter.com